D A V E (tigron_x) wrote in politicartoons,
D A V E
tigron_x
politicartoons

Sabotaging National Security Efforts







Tags: imigration, terrorism
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Comments allowed for members only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 88 comments
Yeah, if the president doesn't think the Constitution applies, why should it?

Deleted comment

Checks and Balances are fine. I love Checks and Balances...just not with the Judiciary ruining it for EVERYONE!!

Deleted comment

planet_x_zero

9 months ago

telemann

9 months ago

Deleted comment

planet_x_zero

8 months ago

Yeah, Lincoln hated the Constitution too ... just like Obama. But Hillary never followed the law either. She and her sexual deviant husband got disbarred for breaking the law.

oslo

9 months ago

I don't see why the threat of IMMEDIATE DEATH is the benchmark here. How about, you don't want the US to turn into Europe? Simple enough.
Pathetic. Absolutely pathetic.
You do realize that the travel ban endangers the US more than it protects it, right?

That it's basically setting up propaganda for ISIS, this like the fucked up attack in Yemen, that killed several children, is like Trump handing out leaflets for ISIS recruiters.

Securing our borders doesn't endanger the US. That's silly.
Let's see, putting out a muslim ban, which gives the idea of the US being against all muslims, thus creating propaganda for ISIS, which makes the US less safe.

tigron_x

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

tigron_x

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

tigron_x

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

tigron_x

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

tigron_x

9 months ago

hardblue

9 months ago

tigron_x

9 months ago

hardblue

9 months ago

tigron_x

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

tigron_x

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

tigron_x

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

tigron_x

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

hardblue

9 months ago

tigron_x

9 months ago

hardblue

9 months ago

tigron_x

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

tigron_x

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

garote

9 months ago

tigron_x

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

tigron_x

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

tigron_x

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

tigron_x

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

tigron_x

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

tigron_x

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

tigron_x

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

jeff_davis1861

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

Alienating the Iraqi Sunnis lends support to ISIS, undermines the stability of the Iraqi government, and drives potential allies to the U.S. mission in Iraq away.

Alienating Iranians lends political support to Iran's military hardliners and narrows the political space Iran's already beleaguered moderates have to maneuver.

Barring Syrian refugees passes those populations off on our European allies, who themselves are disinclined to take many more of them. So we're putting strain on our trans-Atlantic ties at the same time we're pushing Europeans to explore options like sending Syrians to Turkey, with all the compromises that itself requires.

The situations in Yemen, Somalia, and Libya are similarly fraught - in those cases, there are U.S.-allied regimes who are trying to fight off multiple factions of insurgents and terrorist groups.

Meanwhile, the people we're flatly trying to bar from entering into the country are already extensively vetted and come from a migrant population that is unlikely to be a primary channel for terrorists to enter the country. If they wanted to enter, in other words, they would find a better way to do it than to spend a couple of years in a refugee camp on the off chance they would be selected for settlement in the U.S.

So the Muslim ban undermines key American security interests while addressing a minute risk of terrorist infiltration. It's a colossally bad idea, as virtually every independent professional in the area has agreed.

m1ch43l1c3

9 months ago

tigron_x

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

tigron_x

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

garote

9 months ago

tigron_x

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

planet_x_zero

9 months ago

tigron_x

9 months ago

planet_x_zero

9 months ago

jeff_davis1861

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

dexeron

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

johnny9fingers

9 months ago

garote

9 months ago

oslo

9 months ago

garote

9 months ago

Now if only his 72 hadn't already been fact checked and found false... Or if only the seven countries were the worst of the worst for sponsoring terrorism...
Hmmm. The national security aspect...

Mike Flynn? Mar-a-Lago?

Pots/kettles spring to mind.

Never mind the international security angle. The selectiveness of confirmation bias becomes increasingly apparent.
Checks and balances are for loser countries.
I just hope these travel bans are reinstated.

We'll be safe from Radical Islamic terrorists like Timothy McVeigh, Adam Lanza, Dylann Roof, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold,
I am not sure the deaths of those individuals equates to the over three thousand three hundred on September the Eleventh.